Review

Chiropractic and CAM Utilization: A Descriptive Review

Dana J Lawrence¹ and William C Meeker²

¹  Research Department, Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803 USA

²  President, Palmer College of Chiropractic West, 90 E. Tasman Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134 USA

author email corresponding author email

Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2007, 15:2doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-2

Published:	22 January 2007

Abstract

Objective

To conduct a descriptive review of the scientific literature examining use rates of modalities and procedures used by CAM clinicians to manage chronic LBP and other conditions

Data Sources

A literature of PubMed and MANTIS was performed using the key terms Chiropractic; Low Back Pain; Utilization Rate; Use Rate; Complementary and Alternative Medicine; and Health Services in various combinations.

Data Selection

A total of 137 papers were selected, based upon including information about chiropractic utilization, CAM utilization and low back pain and other conditions.

Data Synthesis

Information was extracted from each paper addressing use of chiropractic and CAM, and is summarized in tabular form.

Results

Thematic analysis of the paper topics indicated that there were 5 functional areas covered by the literature: back pain papers, general chiropractic papers, insurance-related papers, general CAM-related papers; and worker's compensation papers.

Conclusion

Studies looking at chiropractic utilization demonstrate that the rates vary, but generally fall into a range from around 6% to 12% of the population, most of whom seek chiropractic care for low back pain and not for organic disease or visceral dysfunction. CAM is itself used by people suffering from a variety of conditions, though it is often used not as a primary intervention, but rather as an additional form of care. CAM and chiropractic often offer lower costs for comparable results compared to conventional medicine.