Research

The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: predicting outcome among chiropractic patients in Finland

Stefan Malmqvist¹ , Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde² , Tuomo Ahola³ , Olli Andersson⁴ , Kristian Ekström⁴ , Harri Pekkarinen⁵ , Markku Turpeinen⁶ and Niels Wedderkopp⁷

¹  The Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, and the Norwegian Centre for Movement Disorders, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

²  Research Professor, Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, part of Clinical Locomotion Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

³  Private Practice, Kangasala, Finland

⁴  Private Practice, Helsinki, Finland

⁵  Private Practice, Tampere, Finland

⁶  Private Practice, Lahti, Finland

⁷  Consultant, The Back Research Centre, part of Clinical Locomotion Science, University of Southern Denmark, Ringe, Denmark

author email corresponding author email

Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2008, 16:13doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-13

Published:	7 November 2008

Abstract

Background

In a previous Swedish study it was shown that it is possible to predict which chiropractic patients with persistent LBP will not report definite improvement early in the course of treatment, namely those with LBP for altogether at least 30 days in the past year, who had leg pain, and who did not report definite general improvement by the second treatment. The objectives of this study were to investigate if the predictive value of this set of variables could be reproduced among chiropractic patients in Finland, and if the model could be improved by adding some new potential predictor variables.

Methods

The study was a multi-centre prospective outcome study with internal control groups, carried out in private chiropractic practices in Finland. Chiropractors collected data at the 1st, 2^nd and 4^th visits using standardized questionnaires on new patients with LBP and/or radiating leg pain. Status at base-line was identified in relation to pain and disability, at the 2^nd visit in relation to disability, and "definitely better" at the 4^th visit in relation to a global assessment. The Swedish questionnaire was used including three new questions on general health, pain in other parts of the spine, and body mass index.

Results

The Swedish model was reproduced in this study sample. An alternative model including leg pain (yes/no), improvement at 2^nd visit (yes/no) and BMI (underweight/normal/overweight or obese) was also identified with similar predictive values. Common throughout the testing of various models was that improvement at the 2^nd visit had an odds ratio of approximately 5. Additional analyses revealed a dose-response in that 84% of those patients who fulfilled none of these (bad) criteria were classified as "definitely better" at the 4^th visit, vs. 75%, 60% and 34% of those who fulfilled 1, 2 or all 3 of the criteria, respectively.

Conclusion

When treating patients with LBP, at the first visits, the treatment strategy should be different for overweight/obese patients with leg pain as it should be for all patients who fail to improve by the 2^nd visit. The number of predictors is also important.