<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com</link>
		<description>The latest articles from Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy (ISSN 1746-1340) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/4"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/20"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/19"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/18"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/17"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/6">
            
            <title>The Nordic maintenance care program &#8211; case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain: A survey of Swedish chiropractors</title>
			<description>Background:
Chiropractic treatment for low back pain (LBP) can often be divided into two phases: Initial treatment of the problem to attempt to remove pain and bring it back into its pre-clinical or maximum improvement status, and "maintenance care", during which it is attempted to maintain this status. Although the use of chiropractic maintenance care has been described and discussed in the literature, there is no information as to its precise indications. The objective of this study is to investigate if there is agreement among Swedish chiropractors on the overall patient management for various types of LBP-scenarios, with a special emphasis on maintenance care.MethodThe design was a mailed questionnaire survey. Members of the Swedish Chiropractors' Association, who were participants in previous practice-based research, were sent a closed-end questionnaire consisting of nine case scenarios and six clinical management alternatives and the possibility to create one's own alternative, resulting in a "nine-by-seven" table. The research team defined its own pre hoc choice of "clinically logical" answers based on the team's clinical experience. The frequency of findings was compared to the suggestions of the research team.
Results:
Replies were received from 59 (60%) of the 99 persons who were invited to take part in the study. A pattern of self-reported clinical management strategies emerged, largely corresponding to the "clinically logical" answers suggested by the research team. In general, patients of concern would be referred out for a second opinion, cases with early recovery and without a history of previous low back pain would be quickly closed, and cases with quick recovery and a history of recurring events would be considered for maintenance care. However, also other management patterns were noted, in particular in the direction of maintenance care.
Conclusion:
To a reasonable extent, Swedish chiropractors participating in this survey appear to agree on the clinical management for different cases of LBP.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/6</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Iben Ax&#233;n, Annika Rosenbaum, Andreas Eklund, Laszlo Halasz, Kristian J&#248;rgensen, Peter W L&#246;vgren, Fredrik Lange and Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2008, 16:6</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-06-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/5">
            
            <title>Enhancement of in vitro interleukin-2 production in normal subjects following a single spinal manipulative treatment</title>
			<description>Background:
Increasing evidence supports somato-visceral effects of manual therapies. We have previously demonstrated that a single spinal manipulative treatment (SMT) accompanied by audible release has an inhibitory effect on the production of proinflammatory cytokines in asymptomatic subjects. The purpose of this study is to report on SMT-related changes in the production of the immunoregulatory cytokine interleukin 2 (IL-2) and to investigate whether such changes might differ with respect to the treatment approach related to the presence or absence of an audible release (joint cavitation).
Methods:
Of 76 asymptomatic subjects, 29 received SMT with cavitation (SMT-C), 23 were treated with SMT without cavitation (SMT-NC) and 24 comprised the venipuncture control (VC) group. The SMT-C and SMT-NC subjects received a single, similar force high velocity low amplitude manipulation, in the upper thoracic spine. However, in SMT-NC subjects, positioning and line of drive were not conducive to cavitation. Blood and serum samples were obtained before and then at 20 and 120 min post-intervention. The production of IL-2 in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures was induced by activation for 48 hr with Staphylococcal protein A (SPA) and, in parallel preparations, with the combination of phorbol ester (TPA) and calcium ionophore. The levels of IL-2 in culture supernatants and serum were assessed by specific immunoassays.
Results:
Compared with VC and their respective baselines, SPA-induced secretion of IL-2 increased significantly in cultures established from both SMT-C and SMT-NC subjects at 20 min post-intervention. At 2 hr post-treatment, significant elevation of IL-2 synthesis was still apparent in preparations from SMT-treated groups though it became somewhat attenuated in SMT-NC subjects. Conversely, IL-2 synthesis induced by TPA and calcium ionophore was unaltered by either type of SMT and was comparable to that in VC group at all time points. No significant alterations in serum-associated IL-2 levels were observed in any of the study groups.
Conclusion:
The present study demonstrates that, the in vitro T lymphocyte response to a conventional mitogen (SPA), as measured by IL-2 synthesis, can become enhanced following SMT. Furthermore, within a period of time following the manipulative intervention, this effect may be independent of joint cavitation. Thus the results of this study suggest that, under certain physiological conditions, SMT might influence IL-2-regulated biological responses.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/5</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Julita A Teodorczyk-Injeyan, H Stephen Injeyan, Marion McGregor, Glen M Harris and Richard Ruegg</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2008, 16:5</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-28</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-28</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/4">
            
            <title>Neuro Emotional Technique for the treatment of trigger point sensitivity in chronic neck pain sufferers: A controlled clinical trial</title>
			<description>Background:
Trigger points have been shown to be active in many myofascial pain syndromes. Treatment of trigger point pain and dysfunction may be explained through the mechanisms of central and peripheral paradigms. This study aimed to investigate whether the mind/body treatment of Neuro Emotional Technique (NET) could significantly relieve pain sensitivity of trigger points presenting in a cohort of chronic neck pain sufferers.
Methods:
Sixty participants presenting to a private chiropractic clinic with chronic cervical pain as their primary complaint were sequentially allocated into treatment and control groups. Participants in the treatment group received a short course of Neuro Emotional Technique that consists of muscle testing, general semantics and Traditional Chinese Medicine. The control group received a sham NET protocol. Outcome measurements included pain assessment utilizing a visual analog scale and a pressure gauge algometer. Pain sensitivity was measured at four trigger point locations: suboccipital region (S); levator scapulae region (LS); sternocleidomastoid region (SCM) and temporomandibular region (TMJ). For each outcome measurement and each trigger point, we calculated the change in measurement between pre- and post- treatment. We then examined the relationships between these measurement changes and six independent variables (i.e. treatment group and the above five additional participant variables) using forward stepwise General Linear Model.
Results:
The visual analog scale (0 to 10) had an improvement of 7.6 at S, 7.2 at LS, 7.5 at SCM and 7.1 at the TMJ in the treatment group compared with no improvement of at S, and an improvement of 0.04 at LS, 0.1 at SCM and 0.1 at the TMJ point in the control group, (P &lt; 0.001).
Conclusion:
After a short course of NET treatment, measurements of visual analog scale and pressure algometer recordings of four trigger point locations in a cohort of chronic neck pain sufferers were significantly improved when compared to a control group which received a sham protocol of NET. Chronic neck pain sufferers may benefit from NET treatment in the relief of trigger point sensitivity. Further research including long-term randomised controlled trials for the effect of NET on chronic neck pain, and other chronic pain syndromes are recommended.Trial RegistrationThis trial has been registered and allocated the Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTR) number ACTRN012607000358448. The ACTR has met the requirements of the ICMJE's trials registration policy and is an ICMJE acceptable registry.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/4</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Peter Bablis, Henry Pollard and Rod Bonello</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2008, 16:4</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-4</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/3">
            
            <title>Maintenance care in chiropractic &#8211; what do we know?</title>
			<description>Background:
Back problems are often recurring or chronic. It is therefore not surprising that chiropractors wish to prevent their return or reduce their impact. This is often attempted with a long-term treatment strategy, commonly called maintenance care. However, some aspects of maintenance care are considered controversial. It is therefore relevant to investigate the scientific evidence forming the basis for its use.ObjectivesA review of the literature was performed in order to obtain answers to the following questions: What is the exact definition of maintenance care, what are its indications for use, and how is it practised? How common is it that chiropractors support the concept of maintenance care, and how well accepted is it by patients? How frequently is maintenance care used, and what factors are associated with its use? Is maintenance care a clinically valid method of approach, and is it cost-effective for the patient?
Results:
Thirteen original studies were found, in which maintenance care was investigated. The relative paucity of studies, the obvious bias in many of these, the lack of exhaustive information, and the diversity of findings made it impossible to answer any of the questions.
Conclusion:
There is no evidence-based definition of maintenance care and the indications for and nature of its use remains to be clearly stated. It is likely that many chiropractors believe in the usefulness of maintenance care but it seems to be less well accepted by their patients. The prevalence with which maintenance care is used has not been established. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of maintenance care for various types of conditions are unknown. Therefore, our conclusion is identical to that of a similar review published in 1996, namely that maintenance care is not well researched and that it needs to be investigated from several angles before the method is subjected to a multi-centre trial.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/3</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde and Lise Hestb&#230;k</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2008, 16:3</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-05-08</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/2">
            
            <title>Carpal tunnel syndrome and the "double crush" hypothesis: a review and implications for chiropractic</title>
			<description>Upton and McComas claimed that most patients with carpal tunnel syndrome not only have compressive lesions at the wrist, but also show evidence of damage to cervical nerve roots. This "double crush" hypothesis has gained some popularity among chiropractors because it seems to provide a rationale for adjusting the cervical spine in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Here I examine use of the concept by chiropractors, summarize findings from the literature, and critique several studies aimed at supporting or refuting the hypothesis. Although the hypothesis also has been applied to nerve compressions other than those leading to carpal tunnel syndrome, this discussion mainly examines the original application &#8211; "double crush" involving both cervical spinal nerve roots and the carpal tunnel. I consider several categories: experiments to create double crush syndrome in animals, case reports, literature reviews, and alternatives to the original hypothesis. A significant percentage of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome also have neck pain or cervical nerve root compression, but the relationship has not been definitively explained. The original hypothesis remains controversial and is probably not valid, at least for sensory disturbances, in carpal tunnel syndrome. However, even if the original hypothesis is importantly flawed, evaluation of multiple sites still may be valuable. The chiropractic profession should develop theoretical models to relate cervical dysfunction to carpal tunnel syndrome, and might incorporate some alternatives to the original hypothesis. I intend this review as a starting point for practitioners, educators, and students wishing to advance chiropractic concepts in this area.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/2</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Brent S Russell</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2008, 16:2</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/1">
            
            <title>Breast size, bra fit and thoracic pain in young women: a correlational study</title>
			<description>IntroductionA single sample study was undertaken to determine the strength and direction of correlations between: a) breast size and thoracic spine or posterior chest wall pain; b) bra fit and thoracic spine or posterior chest wall pain and; c) breast size and bra fit, in thirty nulliparous women (18&#8211;26 years), with thoracic spine or posterior chest wall pain, who wore bras during daytime.MeasuresPain (Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire), bra size (Triumph International), bra fit (Triumph International).
Results:
Most (80%) women wore incorrectly sized bras: 70% wore bras that were too small, 10% wore bras that were too large. Breast size was negatively correlated with both bra size (r = -0.78) and bra fit (r = -0.50). These results together indicate that large breasted women were particularly likely to be wearing incorrectly sized and fitted bras. Negligible relationships were found between pain and bra fit, and breast size and pain. Menstrual cycle stage was moderately positively correlated with bra fit (r = 0.32).
Conclusion:
In young, nulliparous women, thoracic pain appears unrelated to breast size. Bra fit is moderately related to stage of menstrual cycle suggesting that this research may be somewhat confounded by hormonal changes or reproductive stage. Further research is needed to clarify whether there is a relationship between breast size or bra fit and thoracic pain in women during times of hormonal change.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/16/1/1</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Katherine Wood, Melainie Cameron and Kylie Fitzgerald</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2008, 16:1</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-03-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-16-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>16</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/20">
            
            <title>Post-traumatic upper cervical subluxation visualized by MRI: a case report</title>
			<description>Background:
This paper describes MRI findings of upper cervical subluxation due to alar ligament disruption following a vehicular collision. Incidental findings included the presence of a myodural bridge and a spinal cord syrinx. Chiropractic management of the patient is discussed.Case presentationA 21-year old female presented with complaints of acute, debilitating upper neck pain with unremitting sub-occipital headache and dizziness following a vehicular collision. Initial emergency department and neurologic investigations included x-ray and CT evaluation of the head and neck. Due to persistent pain, the patient sought chiropractic care. MRI of the upper cervical spine revealed previously unrecognized clinical entities.
Conclusion:
This case highlights the identification of upper cervical ligamentous injury that produced vertebral subluxation following a traumatic incident. MRI evaluation provided visualization of previously undetected injury. The patient experienced improvement through chiropractic care.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/20</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>James Demetrious</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2007, 15:20</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-12-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-20</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/19">
            
            <title>Effects of body position on autonomic regulation of cardiovascular function in young, healthy adults</title>
			<description>Background:
Analysis of rhythmic patterns embedded within beat-to-beat variations in heart rate (heart rate variability) is a tool used to assess the balance of cardiac autonomic nervous activity and may be predictive for prognosis of some medical conditions, such as myocardial infarction. It has also been used to evaluate the impact of manipulative therapeutics and body position on autonomic regulation of the cardiovascular system. However, few have compared cardiac autonomic activity in supine and prone positions, postures commonly assumed by patients in manual therapy. We intend to redress this deficiency.
Methods:
Heart rate, heart rate variability, and beat-to-beat blood pressure were measured in young, healthy non-smokers, during prone, supine, and sitting postures and with breathing paced at 0.25 Hz. Data were recorded for 5 minutes in each posture: Day 1 &#8211; prone and supine; Day 2 &#8211; prone and sitting. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate posture-related differences in blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability.
Results:
Prone versus supine: blood pressure and heart rate were significantly higher in the prone posture (p &lt; 0.001). Prone versus sitting: blood pressure was higher and heart rate was lower in the prone posture (p &lt; 0.05) and significant differences were found in some components of heart rate variability.
Conclusion:
Cardiac autonomic activity was not measurably different in prone and supine postures, but heart rate and blood pressure were. Although heart rate variability parameters indicated sympathetic dominance during sitting (supporting work of others), blood pressure was higher in the prone posture. These differences should be considered when autonomic regulation of cardiovascular function is studied in different postures.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/19</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Nobuhiro Watanabe, John Reece and Barbara I Polus</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2007, 15:19</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-28</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-28</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/18">
            
            <title>A case report of bilateral synovial chondromatosis of the ankle</title>
			<description>Background:
Synovial chondromatosis is a rare, generally benign condition which affects synovial membranes. It most commonly involves large joints such as the knee, hip, and elbow, but its presence in smaller joints has also been reported. The diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis is commonly made following a thorough history, physical examination, and radiographic examination. Patients may report pain and swelling within a joint which is often aggravated with physical activity.Case presentationA rare case of bilateral synovial chondromatosis of the ankle is reviewed. A 26 year-old male presented with chronic bilateral ankle pain. Physical examination suggested and imaging confirmed multiple synovial chondromatoses bilaterally, likely secondary to previous trauma.
Conclusion:
The clinical and imaging findings, along with potential differential diagnoses, are described. Since this condition tends to be progressive but self-limiting, indications for surgery depend on the level of symptomatic presentation in addition to the functional demands of the patient. Following a surgical consultation, it was decided that it was not appropriate to pursue surgery at the present time.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/18</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Heather Shearer, Paula Stern, Andrew Brubacher and Tania Pringle</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2007, 15:18</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-24</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-18</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/17">
            
            <title>Severe aberrant glenohumeral motor patterns in a young female rower: A case report</title>
			<description>Background:
This case features an 18-year-old female with glenohumeral dysrhythmia and subluxation-relocation patterns. This unusual case highlights the need for careful examination and consideration to the anatomical structures involved.Conventional approaches to shoulder examination include range of motion, orthopaedic tests and manual resistance tests. We also assessed the patient's cognitive ability to coordinate muscle function. With this type of assessment we found that co-contraction of local muscle groups seemed to initially improve the patients abnormal shoulder motion. With this information a rehabilitation method was instituted with a goal to maintain the improvement.Case presentationAn 18-year-old female with no history of trauma, presented with painless kinesiopathology of the left shoulder (in abduction) consisting of dysrhythmia of the glenohumeral joint and early lateral rotation of the scapula. Examination also showed associated muscle atrophy of the lower trapezius and surrounding general muscle weakness. We used an untested functional assessment method in addition to more conventional methods.Exercise rehabilitation interventions were subsequently prescribed and graduated in accordance with what is known as the General Physical Rehabilitation Pyramid.
Conclusion:
This paper presents an unusual case of aberrant shoulder movement. It highlights the need for careful examination and thought regarding the anatomical structures and normal motor patterns associated with the manoeuvre being tested. It also emphasised the use of co-contraction during examination in an attempt to immediately improve a regional dysrythmia if there is suspicion of a regional aberrant motor pattern. Further research may be warranted to test this approach.</description>
			<link>http://www.chiroandosteo.com/content/15/1/17</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Timothy W Stark, Jessica Seebauer, Bruce Walker, Neal McGurk and Jeff Cooley</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy 2007, 15:17</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-13</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Chiropractic &amp; Osteopathy</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1746-1340</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>15</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
